JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 2, 2021

A- de 2021

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Enrique Ibáñez Najar

✓Claimant Nicolas Camilo Avendaño Rozo

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recusación Formulada en contra de la Procuradora General de la Nación.

El memorialista adujo que la jefa del Ministerio Público está incursa en la causal referente a tener interés directo en la decisión.

Ello, por cuanto sostuvo una reunión con el Registrador Nacional del Estado Civil en la que le manifestó a éste su apoyo al Código Electoral luego de que le explicara sus “bondades”.

La Sala Plena considera que la recusación no cumple la condición mínima de legitimación de quien recusa, lo cual conlleva a la impertinencia de la misma y hace innecesario proseguir con el análisis correspondiente a las demás condiciones mínimas de pertinencia.

Se RECHAZA.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR, por falta de legitimacion y, por ende, de pertinencia, la recusacion presentada por el senor Nicolas Camilo Avendano Rozo, en contra de la Procuradora General de la Nacion, dentro del expediente PE-050.
  2. SEGUNDO. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.